eNEWSLETTER SIGNUP
Sign up for our free
Industry eNewsletters
Q+A CENTER
Latest question:
How do you think the new GigE standards will influence the machine vision industry?
Respond or ask your question now!
Industry News
Most Read
Most E-mailed
E-mail Article
Print Article
Vision Sensors Error-Proof Oil Cap Assembly
MPC prevents assembly defects, improves productivity with Cognex Checker vision sensors
Supplying parts to the world's leading automotive companies leaves no room for error. That's why Miniature Precision Components Inc. (MPC) uses three vision sensors to error-proof the automated assembly of oil-caps at its Prairie du Chien, WI facility.
With 41 molding machines ranging in size from 25 to 550 tons, this 100,000 square-foot facility employs about 450 people. MPC's four manufacturing plants generate approximately $167 million per year supplying the automotive and commercial industries with high-quality injection-molded parts and assemblies.
Quality is a given at MPC. In fact, the manufacturer has been a Ford Q1 preferred supplier since 1989, and has received numerous supplier awards from the likes of GM, Nissan, Harley Davidson and Chrysler.
In addition to oil caps, the facility manufactures a host of other thermoplastic parts and assemblies including PCV valves, thermostat housings, and quick-connect ports for emission control systems.
Quality through automation
"We achieve quality through automation, and machine vision has been a key component of our automation strategy for the last seven years," explains Shane Harsha, MPC Manufacturing Engineering Manager.
An automated oil-cap assembly system is a case in point. MPC Automation and Tooling Engineer Brian Champion recently augmented traditional tooling and sensor technology with Checker vision sensors from Cognex Corp. (Natick, MA; www.cognex.com).
The upgrade was very cost-effective and delivered greatly improved repeatability to provide more efficient production of defect-free oil caps.
"Because Checker vision sensors are so simple to set up and easy to install, they offer a very cost-effective solution for inspections where traditional sensors are not reliable and a full-blown vision system is too expensive," explains Harsha.
Making oil caps by the millions
The MPC oil-cap assembly system installs o-ring seals into molded thermoplastic caps, and then prints on top of the caps. The system uses two vibratory bowl feeders, about four feet in diameter. One feeds o-rings and the other feeds oil caps into the process.
A vibratory bowl feeder consists of a large bowl with a spiral ramp up the side. As the bowl vibrates, the parts work their way singly up the ramp, to an inline conveyor. At the end of the inline conveyor a pick-and-place arm transfers o-rings to the first station on a rotary assembly dial.
After an o-ring is loaded onto the dial fixture, it indexes to the second station. There, another inline conveyor feeds blank caps from the other vibratory bowl feeder to a second pick-and-place arm that presses the caps on top of the loaded seals.
Then the assembled cap and seal continue on the rotary dial through the pad printing and final inspection stations to complete the process.
Control Part Orientation
Tight control of o-ring and cap orientation is critical to ensure the seal is properly installed so that the finished oil cap will function as intended. The cap must also be in the right orientation prior to pad printing in order to meet stringent quality requirements.
Because the hard tooling and traditional sensors in the cap assembly system proved unreliable, MPC selected three Checker 202 vision sensors to ensure proper o-ring and cap orientation.
The first detects inverted o-rings between the vibratory feeder bowl and inline conveyor. A second vision sensor checks that the o-ring is positioned properly on the dial fixture before the cap is pressed on. A third ensures cap orientation is correct prior to assembly and printing.
Eliminate flipped o-rings
Each o-ring has a sealing bead on one side. The bead must be placed face down when the seal is loaded onto the assembly dial. If it's not, the machine shuts down. The operator must then access and reposition the seal before restarting the machine.
Mechanical tooling on the feeder bowl was designed to prevent inverted o-rings from entering the process. However, the tooling was unreliable, according to Champion. O-rings that were very slightly warped or not perfectly flat occasionally made it past the tooling, and were loaded upside down causing the machine to shut down.
"Having the operator flip these seals and restart the machine was really eating into our efficiency," says Harsha. "If the production rate dropped from 360 to 200 caps per hour, it cost us about $20,000.00 a year in downtime. As we approach full production volumes, that cost could increase to as much as $120,000.00 per year."
MPC corporate headquarters in Walworth, WI had previously introduced Harsha and his team to the new Cognex Checker vision sensors. Harsha and Champion decided these vision sensors were a perfect fit for this application.
After a demo, they chose Checker 202 vision sensors because they include a simple, yet powerful graphical form of ladder logic that allows tying Checker's individual inspection sensors directly to outputs to easily solve more complex applications.
"The small size, built-in lighting, variable working distance, ladder logic and free-running capability make these devices very simple to install. There was no need to wire them to a PLC, no need to install and wire trigger sensors, and the four-step set up makes it by far the easiest vision sensor that I've ever used," says Champion. "Unlike with the vision systems that we've used in the past, I am able to set up the entire inspection with Checker in just a few minutes."
